↓ Skip to main content

The mirror neuron system as revealed through neonatal imitation: presence from birth, predictive power and evidence of plasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
reddit
6 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The mirror neuron system as revealed through neonatal imitation: presence from birth, predictive power and evidence of plasticity
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2014
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2013.0289
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is strong evidence that neonates imitate previously unseen behaviours. These behaviours are predominantly used in social interactions, demonstrating neonates' ability and motivation to engage with others. Research on neonatal imitation can provide a wealth of information about the early mirror neuron system (MNS), namely its functional characteristics, its plasticity from birth and its relation to skills later in development. Although numerous studies document the existence of neonatal imitation in the laboratory, little is known about its natural occurrence during parent-infant interactions and its plasticity as a consequence of experience. We review these critical aspects of imitation, which we argue are necessary for understanding the early action-perception system. We address common criticisms and misunderstandings about neonatal imitation and discuss methodological differences among studies. Recent work reveals that individual differences in neonatal imitation positively correlate with later social, cognitive and motor development. We propose that such variation in neonatal imitation could reflect important individual differences of the MNS. Although postnatal experience is not necessary for imitation, we present evidence that neonatal imitation is influenced by experience in the first week of life.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 221 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 20%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 50 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 38%
Neuroscience 23 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 53 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2025.
All research outputs
#1,410,590
of 32,934,614 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,211
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,478
of 265,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#11
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,934,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.