↓ Skip to main content

Microfluidics Expands the Zebrafish Potentials in Pharmaceutically Relevant Screening

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Healthcare Materials, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Microfluidics Expands the Zebrafish Potentials in Pharmaceutically Relevant Screening
Published in
Advanced Healthcare Materials, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/adhm.201300546
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The objective of this study is to enlarge the impact of microfluidics on the pharmaceutical industry by highlighting the reported scientific work on the synergistic relationship between zebrafish and microfluidics, and furthering that effort to shed light on how microfluidics can facilitate the use of zebrafish as a gene screening tool. Zebrafish is ranked the third most important animal model after rats and mice, according to a National Institutes of Health (NIH) announcement in 2003. It has become a staple for scientists to examine and subsequently begin to unravel the mystery of human diseases, and is increasingly used in toxicological studies for new drug development. The unique characteristics that this tiny fish possesses, including rapid growth rate, prodigious numbers of offspring, and eggs that develop outside the body, make it an invaluable genetic tool. Evidently, these advantages can be broadened with the addition of a properly designed microfluidic circuit. By means of the presented illustrations and demonstrated applications, the goal is to spark interest in the development of more novel microfluidic platform designs that can leverage the attributes of zebrafish and quickly come to commercial fruition.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 42%
Materials Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Energy 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#22,137,494
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Healthcare Materials
#2,405
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,632
of 317,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Healthcare Materials
#40
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.