↓ Skip to main content

Plant growth‐promoting bacteria elevate the nutritional and functional properties of black cumin and flaxseed fixed oil

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant growth‐promoting bacteria elevate the nutritional and functional properties of black cumin and flaxseed fixed oil
Published in
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, September 2017
DOI 10.1002/jsfa.8631
Pubmed ID
Authors

Snežana Dimitrijević, Marija Pavlović, Svetolik Maksimović, Mihajlo Ristić, Vladimir Filipović, Dušan Antonović, Suzana Dimitrijević‐Branković

Abstract

In order to study the influence of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) belonging to the Streptomyces sp., Paenibacillus sp. and Hymenibacter sp, on fixed oil content of Flaxseed as well as Black cumin, a two years' field experiments were conducted. The PGPB was applied during seedtime of plants. The extraction of oil from seeds was performed with a CO2 supercritical extraction. The addition of PGPB significantly increase the content of C18:1 (from 16.06 ± 0.03% to 16.97 ± 0.03%) and C18:3 (from 42.97 ± 0.2% to 45.42 ± 0.5%) in Flaxseed oil and C18:2 (from 52.68 ± 0.50% to 57.11 ± 0.40%) and C20:2 (from 4.34 ± 0.02% to 4.54 ± 0.03%) in Black cumin seed oil. The content of total polyphenols, flavonoids and carotenoids, as well as antioxidant activity measured by FRAP assay, was found to be greater in the oil from the seed of plant treated with the PGPB, compared to the respective non-treated samples. The use of PGPB enhances the plants nutritive properties, these are representing a great source for obtaining of valuable functional foods ingredients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Engineering 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 14 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#19,213,908
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
#3,094
of 4,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,316
of 322,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
#51
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,512 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.