↓ Skip to main content

Structural Ecosystems Therapy for HIV+ African‐American Women and Drug Abuse Relapse

Overview of attention for article published in Family Process, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structural Ecosystems Therapy for HIV+ African‐American Women and Drug Abuse Relapse
Published in
Family Process, May 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01318.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This report examines the effect of Structural Ecosystems Therapy (SET) for (n=143) HIV+ African-American women on rate of relapse to substance use relative to both a person-centered approach (PCA) to therapy and a community control (CC) group. A prior report has shown SET to decrease psychological distress and family hassles relative to these 2 comparison groups. In new analyses, SET and CC had a significant protective effect against relapse as compared with PCA. There is evidence that SET's protective effect on relapse was related to reductions in family hassles, whereas there was not a direct impact of change in psychological distress on rates of relapse. Lower retention in PCA, perhaps caused by the lack of a directive component to PCA, may have put these women at greater risk for relapse. Whereas SET did not specifically address substance abuse, SET indirectly protected at-risk women from relapse through reductions in family hassles.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,107,308
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Family Process
#880
of 1,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,039
of 99,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Family Process
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.