↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of inferential analysis methods for multilevel studies: Implications for drawing conclusions in animal welfare science

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Animal Behaviour Science, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A comparison of inferential analysis methods for multilevel studies: Implications for drawing conclusions in animal welfare science
Published in
Applied Animal Behaviour Science, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.08.002
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 38%
Psychology 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,711,194
of 28,204,628 outputs
Outputs from Applied Animal Behaviour Science
#1,090
of 2,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,113
of 454,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Animal Behaviour Science
#20
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,204,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.