↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mutation of essential Hsp90 co-chaperones SGT1 or CNS1 renders yeast hypersensitive to overexpression of other co-chaperones
Published in
Current Genetics, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00294-014-0432-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The essential molecular chaperone Hsp90 functions with over ten co-chaperones in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but the in vivo roles of many of these co-chaperones are poorly understood. Two of these co-chaperones, Cdc37 and Sgt1, target specific types of clients to Hsp90 for folding. Other co-chaperones have general roles in supporting Hsp90 function, but the degree of overlapping or competing functions is unclear. None of the chaperones, when overexpressed, were able to rescue the lethality of an SGT1 disruption strain. However, overexpression of SBA1, PPT1, AHA1 or HCH1 caused varying levels of growth defects in an sgt1-K360E strain. Negative effects of CPR6 overexpression were similarly observed in cells expressing the temperature-sensitive mutation cns1-G90D. In all cases, alterations within co-chaperones designed to disrupt Hsp90 interaction relieved the negative growth defects. Sgt1-K360E and Cns1-G90D were previously shown to exhibit reduced Hsp90 interaction. Our results indicate that overexpression of other co-chaperones further disrupts the essential functions of Cns1 and Sgt1. However, the specificity of the negative effects indicates that only a subset of co-chaperones competes with Sgt1 or Cns1 for binding to Hsp90. This provides new evidence that co-chaperones selectively compete for binding to subpopulations of cellular Hsp90 and suggest that changes in the relative levels of co-chaperones may have dramatic effects on Hsp90 function.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 41%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 29%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2014.
All research outputs
#17,722,094
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#927
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,842
of 228,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.