Lifetime risk for malignant melanoma has increased from 1 in 1500 in the United States in 1930 to 1 in 75 projected for the year 2000. Because the tumor's thickness at excision is the primary prognostic determinant, early detection through the history and physical examination can play an important role in the patient's clinical course. Two checklists have been developed as diagnostic aids, the ABCD (A indicates asymmetry; B, border irregularity; C, irregular color; and D, diameter >6 mm) and the revised 7-point checklists. These checklists should be interpreted with some discretion, but 2 studies have found the sensitivity for the ABCD checklist to be 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-96%) and 100% (95% CI, 54%-100%); 1 study found the specificity to be 98% (95% CI, 95%-99%). The revised 7-point checklist has been reported to have a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI, 70%-85%) to 100% (95% CI, 94%-100%) and specificity of 30% (95% CI, 21%-39%) to 37% (95% CI, 28%-46%). Physicians' global assessments for detecting the presence or absence of melanoma are estimated to have a specificity of 96% to 99%, while sensitivity ranges widely from 50% to 97%. Nondermatologists' examinations appear to be less sensitive than examinations performed by dermatologists.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2015.
All research outputs
#674,493
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#6,670
of 42,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180
of 45,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#8
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
