↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian modeling of flexible cognitive control

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bayesian modeling of flexible cognitive control
Published in
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

"Cognitive control" describes endogenous guidance of behavior in situations where routine stimulus-response associations are suboptimal for achieving a desired goal. The computational and neural mechanisms underlying this capacity remain poorly understood. We examine recent advances stemming from the application of a Bayesian learner perspective that provides optimal prediction for control processes. In reviewing the application of Bayesian models to cognitive control, we note that an important limitation in current models is a lack of a plausible mechanism for the flexible adjustment of control over conflict levels changing at varying temporal scales. We then show that flexible cognitive control can be achieved by a Bayesian model with a volatility-driven learning mechanism that modulates dynamically the relative dependence on recent and remote experiences in its prediction of future control demand. We conclude that the emergent Bayesian perspective on computational mechanisms of cognitive control holds considerable promise, especially if future studies can identify neural substrates of the variables encoded by these models, and determine the nature (Bayesian or otherwise) of their neural implementation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 4 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Unknown 189 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 19%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 98 48%
Neuroscience 24 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 52 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,392,265
of 28,152,116 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#2,361
of 4,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,652
of 247,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,152,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.