↓ Skip to main content

Key mediators in the immunopathogenesis of allergic asthma

Overview of attention for article published in International Immunopharmacology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Key mediators in the immunopathogenesis of allergic asthma
Published in
International Immunopharmacology, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.05.034
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Asthma is described as a chronic inflammatory disorder of the conducting airways. It is characterized by reversible airway obstruction, eosinophil and Th2 infiltration, airway hyper-responsiveness and airway remodeling. Our findings to date have largely been dependent on work done using animal models, which have been instrumental in broadening our understanding of the mechanism of the disease. However, using animals to model a uniquely human disease is not without its drawbacks. This review aims to examine some of the key mediators and cells of allergic asthma learned from animal models and shed some light on emerging mediators in the pathogenesis allergic airway inflammation in acute and chronic asthma.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 58 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 64 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#17,874,146
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from International Immunopharmacology
#2,198
of 4,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,680
of 245,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Immunopharmacology
#29
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.