↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of Road Traffic Incidents in Peru 1973–2008: Incidence, Mortality, and Fatality

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Epidemiology of Road Traffic Incidents in Peru 1973–2008: Incidence, Mortality, and Fatality
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0099662
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Jaime Miranda, Luis A. López-Rivera, D. Alex Quistberg, Edmundo Rosales-Mayor, Camila Gianella, Ada Paca-Palao, Diego Luna, Luis Huicho, PIAT Working Group, Ada Paca, López Luis, Diego Luna, Edmundo Rosales, Pablo Best, Pablo Best, Miriam Egúsquiza, Camila Gianella, Claudia Lema, Esperanza Ludeña, J. Jaime Miranda, Luis Huicho

Abstract

The epidemiological profile and trends of road traffic injuries (RTIs) in Peru have not been well-defined, though this is a necessary step to address this significant public health problem in Peru. The objective of this study was to determine trends of incidence, mortality, and fatality of RTIs in Peru during 1973-2008, as well as their relationship to population trends such as economic growth.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Peru 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 34%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2026.
All research outputs
#2,755,033
of 34,454,098 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#29,575
of 224,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,898
of 277,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#583
of 4,679 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,454,098 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,679 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.