↓ Skip to main content

The Dynamics of Enterococcus Transmission from Bacterial Reservoirs Commonly Encountered by Anesthesia Providers

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Dynamics of Enterococcus Transmission from Bacterial Reservoirs Commonly Encountered by Anesthesia Providers
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2015
DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000000123
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Enterococci, the second leading cause of health care-associated infections, have evolved from commensal and harmless organisms to multidrug-resistant bacteria associated with a significant increase in patient morbidity and mortality. Prevention of ongoing spread of this organism within and between hospitals is important. In this study, we characterized Enterococcus transmission dynamics for bacterial reservoirs commonly encountered by anesthesia providers during the routine administration of general anesthesia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#10,318,328
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#3,984
of 10,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,810
of 307,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#40
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.