↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association and genetic functional studies identify autism susceptibility candidate 2 gene (AUTS2) in the regulation of alcohol consumption

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genome-wide association and genetic functional studies identify autism susceptibility candidate 2 gene (AUTS2) in the regulation of alcohol consumption
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1017288108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunter Schumann, Lachlan J. Coin, Anbarasu Lourdusamy, Pimphen Charoen, Karen H. Berger, David Stacey, Sylvane Desrivières, Fazil A. Aliev, Anokhi A. Khan, Najaf Amin, Yurii S. Aulchenko, Georgy Bakalkin, Stephan J. Bakker, Beverley Balkau, Joline W. Beulens, Ainhoa Bilbao, Rudolf A. de Boer, Delphine Beury, Michiel L. Bots, Elemi J. Breetvelt, Stéphane Cauchi, Christine Cavalcanti-Proença, John C. Chambers, Toni-Kim Clarke, Norbert Dahmen, Eco J. de Geus, Danielle Dick, Francesca Ducci, Alanna Easton, Howard J. Edenberg, Tõnu Esko, Alberto Fernández-Medarde, Tatiana Foroud, Nelson B. Freimer, Jean-Antoine Girault, Diederick E. Grobbee, Simonetta Guarrera, Daniel F. Gudbjartsson, Anna-Liisa Hartikainen, Andrew C. Heath, Victor Hesselbrock, Albert Hofman, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Matti K. Isohanni, Jaakko Kaprio, Kay-Tee Khaw, Brigitte Kuehnel, Jaana Laitinen, Stéphane Lobbens, Jian'an Luan, Massimo Mangino, Matthieu Maroteaux, Giuseppe Matullo, Mark I. McCarthy, Christian Mueller, Gerjan Navis, Mattijs E. Numans, Alejandro Núñez, Dale R. Nyholt, Charlotte N. Onland-Moret, Ben A. Oostra, Paul F. O'Reilly, Miklos Palkovits, Brenda W. Penninx, Silvia Polidoro, Anneli Pouta, Inga Prokopenko, Fulvio Ricceri, Eugenio Santos, Johannes H. Smit, Nicole Soranzo, Kijoung Song, Ulla Sovio, Michael Stumvoll, Ida Surakk, Thorgeir E. Thorgeirsson, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Claire Troakes, Thorarinn Tyrfingsson, Anke Tönjes, Cuno S. Uiterwaal, Andre G. Uitterlinden, Pim van der Harst, Yvonne T. van der Schouw, Oliver Staehlin, Nicole Vogelzangs, Peter Vollenweider, Gerard Waeber, Nicholas J. Wareham, Dawn M. Waterworth, John B. Whitfield, Erich H. Wichmann, Gonneke Willemsen, Jacqueline C. Witteman, Xin Yuan, Guangju Zhai, Jing H. Zhao, Weihua Zhang, Nicholas G. Martin, Andres Metspalu, Angela Doering, James Scott, Tim D. Spector, Ruth J. Loos, Dorret I. Boomsma, Vincent Mooser, Leena Peltonen, Kari Stefansson, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Paolo Vineis, Wolfgang H. Sommer, Jaspal S. Kooner, Rainer Spanagel, Ulrike A. Heberlein, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Paul Elliott

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 284 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 19%
Researcher 56 19%
Professor 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 6%
Other 57 19%
Unknown 63 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 12%
Neuroscience 23 8%
Psychology 23 8%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 80 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,185,060
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16,969
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,973
of 161,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#83
of 782 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 782 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.