↓ Skip to main content

The Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus Transmission in the Anesthesia Work Area

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus Transmission in the Anesthesia Work Area
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, April 2015
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e3182a8c16a
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Little is known regarding the epidemiology of intraoperative Staphylococcal aureus transmission. The primary aim of this study was to examine the mode of transmission, reservoir of origin, transmission locations, and antibiotic susceptibility for frequently encountered S aureus strains (phenotypes) in the anesthesia work area. Our secondary aims were to examine phenotypic associations with 30-day postoperative patient cultures, phenotypic growth rates, and risk factors for phenotypic isolation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 94 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#9,609,254
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#3,762
of 10,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,231
of 307,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#36
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.