You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bringing an ecological view of change to Landsat‐based remote sensing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1890/130066 |
| Authors |
Robert E Kennedy, Serge Andréfouët, Warren B Cohen, Cristina Gómez, Patrick Griffiths, Martin Hais, Sean P Healey, Eileen H Helmer, Patrick Hostert, Mitchell B Lyons, Garrett W Meigs, Dirk Pflugmacher, Stuart R Phinn, Scott L Powell, Peter Scarth, Susmita Sen, Todd A Schroeder, Annemarie Schneider, Ruth Sonnenschein, James E Vogelmann, Michael A Wulder, Zhe Zhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 597 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 2% |
| Czechia | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 566 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 132 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 127 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 102 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 72 | 12% |
| Unknown | 95 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 210 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 89 | 15% |
| Engineering | 21 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 4% |
| Unknown | 145 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,405,843
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#844
of 1,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,672
of 246,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.