↓ Skip to main content

Somatic symptom count scores do not identify patients with symptoms unexplained by disease: a prospective cohort study of neurology outpatients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Somatic symptom count scores do not identify patients with symptoms unexplained by disease: a prospective cohort study of neurology outpatients
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, June 2014
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308234
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Somatic symptoms unexplained by disease are common in all medical settings. The process of identifying such patients requires a clinical assessment often supported by clinical tests. Such assessments are time-consuming and expensive. Consequently the observation that such patients tend to report a greater number of symptom has led to the use of self-rated somatic symptom counts as a simpler and cheaper diagnostic aid and proxy measure for epidemiological surveys. However, despite their increasing popularity there is little evidence to support their validity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Neuroscience 12 16%
Psychology 11 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 26 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2026.
All research outputs
#12,436,002
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#4,706
of 8,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,768
of 259,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#52
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.