↓ Skip to main content

Medicinal plants in Mexico: healers' consensus and cultural importance

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science & Medicine, December 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
728 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Medicinal plants in Mexico: healers' consensus and cultural importance
Published in
Social Science & Medicine, December 1998
DOI 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00181-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Medicinal plants are an important element of indigenous medical systems in Mexico. These resources are usually regarded as part of a culture's traditional knowledge. This study examines the use of medicinal plants in four indigenous groups of Mexican Indians, Maya, Nahua, Zapotec and - for comparative purposes - Mixe. With the first three the methodology was similar, making a direct comparison of the results possible. In these studies, the relative importance of a medicinal plant within a culture is documented using a quantitative method. For the analysis the uses were grouped into 9-10 categories of indigenous uses. This report compares these data and uses the concept of informant consensus originally developed by Trotter and Logan for analysis. This indicates how homogenous the ethnobotanical information is. Generally the factor is high for gastrointestinal illnesses and for culture bound syndromes. While the species used by the 3 indigenous groups vary, the data indicate that there exist well-defined criteria specific for each culture which lead to the selection of a plant as a medicine. A large number of species are used for gastrointestinal illnesses by two or more of the indigenous groups. At least in this case, the multiple transfer of species and their uses within Mexico seems to be an important reason for the widespread use of a species. Medicinal plants in other categories (e.g. skin diseases) are usually known only in one culture and seem to be part of its traditional knowledge.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 728 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 7 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 705 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 13%
Student > Master 74 10%
Researcher 62 9%
Student > Bachelor 56 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 5%
Other 126 17%
Unknown 279 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 169 23%
Environmental Science 42 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 4%
Chemistry 31 4%
Other 119 16%
Unknown 303 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#9,226,786
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#7,594
of 12,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,308
of 117,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#38
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.