| Title |
Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-271 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marissa K Constand, Joy C MacDermid, Vanina Dal Bello-Haas, Mary Law |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this scoping review was to describe how three tenants of patient-centered care provision: communication, partnership, and health promotion are addressed in patient-centered care models/frameworks across the literature. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Jordan | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 767 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 758 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 113 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 84 | 11% |
| Researcher | 77 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 7% |
| Other | 137 | 18% |
| Unknown | 202 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 178 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 167 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 54 | 7% |
| Psychology | 30 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 2% |
| Other | 104 | 14% |
| Unknown | 217 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,249,361
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,928
of 8,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,982
of 235,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#26
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.