↓ Skip to main content

The role of interleukin-17 in immune-mediated inflammatory myopathies and possible therapeutic implications

Overview of attention for article published in Neuromuscular Disorders, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The role of interleukin-17 in immune-mediated inflammatory myopathies and possible therapeutic implications
Published in
Neuromuscular Disorders, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.06.432
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune muscle disorders with distinct clinical and pathological features and underlying immunopathogenic mechanisms. Traditionally, CD4(+) Th1 cells or CD8(+) cytotoxic effector T cells and type I/II interferons have been primarily implicated in the pathogenesis of the inflammatory myopathies. The presence of IL-17A producing cells in the inflamed muscle tissue of myositis patients and the results of in vitro studies suggest that IL-17A and the Th17 pathway may also have a key role in these diseases. The contribution of IL-17A to other chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases has been well established and clinical trials of IL-17A inhibitors are now at an advanced stage. However the precise role of IL-17A in the various forms of myositis and the potential for therapeutic targeting is currently unknown and warrants further investigation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Postgraduate 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2025.
All research outputs
#19,355,653
of 29,720,770 outputs
Outputs from Neuromuscular Disorders
#1,211
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,062
of 250,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuromuscular Disorders
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,720,770 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.