↓ Skip to main content

Heteroleptic Fe(II) Complexes with N4S2 Coordination as a Platform for Designing Spin-Crossover Materials

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Heteroleptic Fe(II) Complexes with N4S2 Coordination as a Platform for Designing Spin-Crossover Materials
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, August 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01415
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Heteroleptic complexes [Fe(bpte)(bim)]X2 and [Fe(bpte)(xbim)]X2 (bpte = S,S'-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,2-thioethane, bim = 2,2'-biimidazole, xbim = 1,1'-(α,α'-o-xylyl)-2,2'-biimidazole, X = ClO4(-), BF4(-), OTf(-)) were prepared by reacting the corresponding Fe(II) salts with a 1:1 mixture of the ligands. All mononuclear complexes exhibit temperature-induced spin crossover (SCO) with the onset above room temperature. The SCO is rather gradual, due to low cooperativity of interactions between the cationic complexes, as revealed by crystal structure analyses. These complexes expand the range of the recently discovered Fe(II) SCO materials with {N4S2} coordination environment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 34%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 25 66%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#12,992,364
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#9,443
of 21,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,055
of 315,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#75
of 342 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 342 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.