↓ Skip to main content

The LYR Factors SDHAF1 and SDHAF3 Mediate Maturation of the Iron-Sulfur Subunit of Succinate Dehydrogenase

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The LYR Factors SDHAF1 and SDHAF3 Mediate Maturation of the Iron-Sulfur Subunit of Succinate Dehydrogenase
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.05.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Disorders arising from impaired assembly of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) result in a myriad of pathologies, consistent with its unique role in linking the citric acid cycle and electron transport chain. In spite of this critical function, however, only a few factors are known to be required for SDH assembly and function. We show here that two factors, Sdh6 (SDHAF1) and Sdh7 (SDHAF3), mediate maturation of the FeS cluster SDH subunit (Sdh2/SDHB). Yeast and Drosophila lacking SDHAF3 are impaired in SDH activity with reduced levels of Sdh2. Drosophila lacking the Sdh7 ortholog SDHAF3 are hypersensitive to oxidative stress and exhibit muscular and neuronal dysfunction. Yeast studies revealed that Sdh6 and Sdh7 act together to promote Sdh2 maturation by binding to a Sdh1/Sdh2 intermediate, protecting it from the deleterious effects of oxidants. These studies in yeast and Drosophila raise the possibility that SDHAF3 mutations may be associated with idiopathic SDH-associated diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 104 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 28 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#10,711,062
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#3,011
of 3,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,727
of 275,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#39
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.