↓ Skip to main content

Naturalistic assessment of executive function and everyday multitasking in healthy older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Naturalistic assessment of executive function and everyday multitasking in healthy older adults
Published in
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, April 2013
DOI 10.1080/13825585.2013.781990
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Everyday multitasking and its cognitive correlates were investigated in an older adult population using a naturalistic task, the Day Out Task. Fifty older adults and 50 younger adults prioritized, organized, initiated, and completed a number of subtasks in a campus apartment to prepare for a day out (e.g., gather ingredients for a recipe, collect change for a bus ride). Participants also completed tests assessing cognitive constructs important in multitasking. Compared to younger adults, the older adults took longer to complete the everyday tasks and more poorly sequenced the subtasks. Although they initiated, completed, and interweaved a similar number of subtasks, the older adults demonstrated poorer task quality and accuracy, completing more subtasks inefficiently. For the older adults, reduced prospective memory abilities were predictive of poorer task sequencing, while executive processes and prospective memory were predictive of inefficiently completed subtasks. The findings suggest that executive dysfunction and prospective memory difficulties may contribute to the age-related decline of everyday multitasking abilities in healthy older adults.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 97 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Unspecified 6 6%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 39%
Computer Science 7 7%
Unspecified 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#9,381,904
of 27,353,931 outputs
Outputs from Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
#243
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,867
of 218,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,353,931 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.