↓ Skip to main content

A randomised trial of pre-exercise meal composition on performance and muscle damage in well-trained basketball players

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A randomised trial of pre-exercise meal composition on performance and muscle damage in well-trained basketball players
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-11-33
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Attenuating muscle damage is important to subsequent sports performance. It is possible that pre-exercise protein intake could influence markers of muscle damage and benefit performance, however, published research provides conflicting results. At present no study has investigated protein and carbohydrate (PRO/CHO) co-ingestion solely pre-exercise, nor prior to basketball-specific exercise. The purpose of this study was to answer the research question; would pre-exercise protein intake enhance performance or attenuate muscle damage during a basketball simulation test?

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 18%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 43 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 29 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 44 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2014.
All research outputs
#2,927,393
of 31,706,556 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#540
of 1,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,897
of 459,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#446
of 856 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,706,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 856 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.