↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Personal Knowledge and Decision Self‐Efficacy in Choosing Trial of Labor After Cesarean

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Relationship Between Personal Knowledge and Decision Self‐Efficacy in Choosing Trial of Labor After Cesarean
Published in
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, May 2014
DOI 10.1111/jmwh.12173
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The number of women in the United States giving birth via cesarean remains high as the number of vaginal births after cesarean (VBAC) declines. The purpose of this study was to explore how personal knowledge and decision self-efficacy of women who had a prior cesarean birth affected their decision about mode of birth in a subsequent pregnancy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 38 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 40 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#22,271,113
of 27,264,936 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
#1,117
of 1,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,782
of 243,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,264,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.