↓ Skip to main content

The oral health of homeless adolescents and young adults and determinants of oral health: preliminary findings

Overview of attention for article published in Special Care in Dentistry, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 540)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The oral health of homeless adolescents and young adults and determinants of oral health: preliminary findings
Published in
Special Care in Dentistry, October 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2008.00046.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A survey was administered to 55 homeless adolescents and young adults aged 14 to 28 years who presented for care at a community health center in Seattle, Washington in 2005. Forty-five valid surveys were analyzed. The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with self-reported oral health. The most common self-reported dental problem was sensitive teeth (52.6%), followed by discolored teeth (48.6%), toothache (38.5%), or a broken tooth (37.8%). Dental problems were associated with lower self-reported oral health, while non-high school graduates, mixed race youths, and methamphetamine users had significantly higher self-reported oral health. Among homeless youths, addressing dental problems with direct dental care may improve self-perceived oral health. The relationships between methamphetamine use and education level, on the one hand, and self-reported oral health, on the other, are complex and may be modified by age.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Professor 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,922,643
of 32,091,044 outputs
Outputs from Special Care in Dentistry
#24
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,090
of 135,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Special Care in Dentistry
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,091,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.