↓ Skip to main content

Possibilities of networked electronic theses in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Library Management, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Possibilities of networked electronic theses in Japan
Published in
Library Management, June 2014
DOI 10.1108/lm-09-2013-0095
Authors

Makoto Shuto, Takayuki Manaka, Satoshi Nakayama, Hideki Uchijima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 9 53%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 3 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 18%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Computer Science 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Library Management
#144
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,125
of 242,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Library Management
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.