↓ Skip to main content

Superantigens of Staphylococcus aureus From Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Superantigens of Staphylococcus aureus From Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, June 2014
DOI 10.1093/infdis/jiu350
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

 Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) infections are challenging. Staphylococcus aureus is the most commonly isolated pathogen in DFUs. Superantigens (SAgs) are causative in many S. aureus infections. We hypothesized both that DFU S. aureus will produce large SAg numbers, consistent with skin infections, and that certain SAgs will be over-represented. We assessed the SAg and α-toxin profile of isolates from DFU patients compared to other sources.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 27 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 29 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#23,619,422
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#16,872
of 19,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,310
of 277,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#76
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.