↓ Skip to main content

Shared Reality: Experiencing Commonality with others' Inner States about the World

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives on Psychological Science, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
562 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Shared Reality: Experiencing Commonality with others' Inner States about the World
Published in
Perspectives on Psychological Science, May 2017
DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Humans have a fundamental need to experience a shared reality with others. We present a new conceptualization of shared reality based on four conditions. We posit (a) that shared reality involves a (subjectively perceived) commonality of individuals' inner states (not just observable behaviors); (b) that shared reality is about some target referent; (c) that for a shared reality to occur, the commonality of inner states must be appropriately motivated; and (d) that shared reality involves the experience of a successful connection to other people's inner states. In reviewing relevant evidence, we emphasize research on the saying-is-believing effect, which illustrates the creation of shared reality in interpersonal communication. We discuss why shared reality provides a better explanation of the findings from saying-is-believing studies than do other formulations. Finally, we examine relations between our conceptualization of shared reality and related constructs (including empathy, perspective taking, theory of mind, common ground, embodied synchrony, and socially distributed knowledge) and indicate how our approach may promote a comprehensive and differentiated understanding of social-sharing phenomena.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Germany 4 <1%
China 4 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 530 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 138 25%
Student > Master 66 12%
Researcher 55 10%
Student > Bachelor 49 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 95 17%
Unknown 128 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 244 43%
Social Sciences 46 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 39 7%
Computer Science 20 4%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 56 10%
Unknown 148 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 240. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2026.
All research outputs
#195,103
of 34,297,879 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives on Psychological Science
#112
of 1,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,349
of 356,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives on Psychological Science
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,879 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.