↓ Skip to main content

The experiences of detained mental health service users: issues of dignity in care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The experiences of detained mental health service users: issues of dignity in care
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-15-50
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

When mental health service users are detained under a Section of the Mental Health Act (MHA), they must remain in hospital for a specific time period. This is often against their will, as they are considered a danger to themselves and/or others. By virtue of being detained, service users are assumed to have lost control of an element of their behaviour and as a result their dignity could be compromised. Caring for detained service users has particular challenges for healthcare professionals. Respecting the dignity of others is a key element of the code of conduct for health professionals. Often from the service user perspective this is ignored.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 16%
Student > Master 22 12%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 65 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 15%
Psychology 28 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 13%
Social Sciences 19 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 68 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,764,743
of 27,735,993 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#377
of 1,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,193
of 246,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,735,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.