↓ Skip to main content

Yellow Fever Virus, but Not Zika Virus or Dengue Virus, Inhibits T-Cell Receptor–Mediated T-Cell Function by an RNA-Based Mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Yellow Fever Virus, but Not Zika Virus or Dengue Virus, Inhibits T-Cell Receptor–Mediated T-Cell Function by an RNA-Based Mechanism
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2017
DOI 10.1093/infdis/jix462
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Flavivirus genus within the Flaviviridae is comprised of many important human pathogens including Yellow Fever virus (YFV), Dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZKV), all of which are global public health concerns. Although the related flaviviruses hepatitis C virus and human pegivirus (formerly named GBV-C) interfere with T cell receptor (TCR) signaling by novel RNA and protein based mechanisms, the effect of other flaviviruses on TCR signaling is unknown. Here, we studied the effect of YFV, DENV, and ZKV on TCR signaling. Both YFV and ZKV replicated in human T cells in vitro; however, only YFV inhibited TCR signaling. This effect was mediated at least in part by the YFV envelope (env) protein coding RNA. Deletion mutagenesis studies demonstrated that expression of a short, YFV env RNA motif (vsRNA) was required and sufficient to inhibit TCR signaling. Expression of this vsRNA and YFV infection of T cells reduced the expression of Src-kinase regulatory phosphatase (PTPRE), while ZKV infection did not. YFV infection in mice resulted in impaired TCR signaling and PTPRE expression, with associated reduction in murine response to experimental ovalbumin vaccination. Together, these data suggest that viruses within the flavivirus genus inhibit TCR signaling in a species-dependent manner.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 11 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#23,179,195
of 34,226,562 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#16,502
of 18,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,387
of 355,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#132
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,226,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.