↓ Skip to main content

Filling the void in geriatric mental health: The Geropsychiatric Nursing Collaborative as a model for change

Overview of attention for article published in Nursing Outlook, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Filling the void in geriatric mental health: The Geropsychiatric Nursing Collaborative as a model for change
Published in
Nursing Outlook, July 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.outlook.2011.05.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mental health for older adults is a looming public health problem. Yet, geriatric mental health specialists are a scarce commodity, and few generalists have had formal education in either geriatrics or mental health. A multilevel collaboration using a diffusion of innovation model served to achieve change nationally in preparing entry-and advanced practice-level nurses to improve the mental health of older Americans. The John A. Hartford Foundation Geropsychiatric Nursing Collaborative at the American Academy of Nursing is the exemplar described here. The Geropsychiatric Nursing Collaborative developed and infused mental health competency enhancements for generalist and specialist nurses; identified and disseminated teaching-learning strategies to convey related key concepts using the POGOe (Portal of Geriatric Online Education) website; raised awareness through multiple presentations and publications; and notified deans of every school of nursing about these new resources. Fully embracing diffusion of innovation principles, the Geropsychiatric Nursing Collaborative is achieving change in this critical area of nursing practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Professor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Librarian 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 19 33%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 11%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Psychology 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,753,124
of 26,646,559 outputs
Outputs from Nursing Outlook
#381
of 995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,353
of 130,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing Outlook
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,646,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.