↓ Skip to main content

Emergence and Rapid Regional Spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase–Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Emergence and Rapid Regional Spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase–Producing Enterobacteriaceae
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 2011
DOI 10.1093/cid/cir482
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exposure network analysis and molecular epidemiologic methods were used to analyze the emergence and regional spread of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae over a 1-year period. Although 40 patients and 26 health care facilities were affected, 1 long-term acute care hospital played a critical role in the convergence of patients at high risk, amplification by cross-infection, and dissemination of these multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 243 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 19%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Other 19 8%
Other 52 21%
Unknown 46 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 61 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2025.
All research outputs
#1,400,420
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#2,509
of 21,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,319
of 172,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#9
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.