↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The natural chemopreventive phytochemical R‐sulforaphane is a far more potent inducer of the carcinogen‐detoxifying enzyme systems in rat liver and lung than the S‐isomer
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/ijc.25620
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The chemopreventive activity of the phytochemical sulforaphane, (-)1-isothiocyanato-4R-(methylsulfinyl)-butane, present in cruciferous vegetables in substantial amounts in the form of glucosinolate, was demonstrated in animal models of cancer using the racemate, despite the fact that humans are exposed only to the R-enantiomer through the diet. Since a principal mechanism of the chemopreventive activity of sulforaphane is modulation of the carcinogen-metabolising enzyme systems, a study was conducted in precision-cut rat liver and lung slices, and in FAO cells comparing the ability of R- and S-sulforaphane to modulate these enzyme systems. R-sulforaphane elevated hepatic glutathione S-transferase and quinone reductase whereas the S-enantiomer had no effect; moreover, the R-enantiomer was more effective in up-regulating GSTα, GSTμ and quinone reductase protein levels. In the lung, both enantiomers increased the same enzyme activities with the R-enantiomer being more potent; in addition, the R-enantiomer was more effective in up-regulating GSTα and quinone reductase protein levels. Both isomers increased glutathione levels in both tissues, with R-sulforaphane being more potent. Finally, R-sulforaphane was the more effective of the two isomers in up-regulating CYP1A1/1B1 apoprotein levels in both liver and lung, and CYP1A2 in the liver. Similarly, in FAO cells the R-enantiomer was far more effective in up-regulating quinone reductase and glutathione S-transferase activities and protein levels compared with the S-isomer. These studies demonstrate clearly the superiority of R-sulforaphane, when compared with the S-enantiomer, in stimulating detoxification enzymes, and raises the possibility that the animal studies that employed the racemate may have underestimated the chemopreventive activity of this isothiocyanate.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 2 4%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Chemistry 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,974,604
of 28,812,439 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#1,193
of 13,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,792
of 122,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#13
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,812,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.