↓ Skip to main content

Ultrafast Spectroscopic Dynamics of Quinacrine-Riboflavin Binding Protein Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry B, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ultrafast Spectroscopic Dynamics of Quinacrine-Riboflavin Binding Protein Interactions
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, August 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b05304
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Redox active cofactors play a dynamic role inside protein binding active sites because the amino acids responsible for binding participate in electron transfer (ET) reactions. Here, we use transient absorption spectroscopy to examine the ultrafast ET between quinacrine (Qc), an antimalarial drug with potential anticancer activity, and riboflavin binding protein (RfBP) with a known Kd =264 nM. Steady-state absorption reveal a ~10 nm red-shift in the ground state when QcH32+ is titrated with RfBP, and a Stern-Volmer analysis shows ~84% quenching and blue-shift of the QcH32+ photoluminescence to form a 1:1 binding ratio of the QcH3(2+)-RfBP complex. Upon selective photoexcitation of QcH3(2+) in the QcH3(2+)-RfBP complex with ~70 fs pulses, we observe charge separation in 7 ps to form 1[QcH3_red●+-RfBP●+] that persist for 138 ps. The FsTA spectra show the spectroscopic identification of QcH3_red●+, determined from spectroelectrochemical measurements in DMSO. We correlate our results to recent literature and report lifetimes that are 10-20× slower than the natural riboflavin, Rf-RfBP, complex and are oxygen independent. Driving force (ΔG) calculations, corrected for estimated dielectric constants for protein hydrophobic pockets, and Marcus theory depict a favorable one electron ET process between QcH32+ and nearby redox active tyrosine (Tyr) or tryptophan (Trp) residues.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Chemistry 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 7 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2017.
All research outputs
#28,747,015
of 34,517,649 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#13,512
of 17,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,959
of 355,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#147
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.