↓ Skip to main content

Regional differences in brain volume predict the acquisition of skill in a complex real-time strategy videogame

Overview of attention for article published in Brain & Cognition, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regional differences in brain volume predict the acquisition of skill in a complex real-time strategy videogame
Published in
Brain & Cognition, May 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous studies have found that differences in brain volume among older adults predict performance in laboratory tasks of executive control, memory, and motor learning. In the present study we asked whether regional differences in brain volume as assessed by the application of a voxel-based morphometry technique on high resolution MRI would also be useful in predicting the acquisition of skill in complex tasks, such as strategy-based video games. Twenty older adults were trained for over 20 h to play Rise of Nations, a complex real-time strategy game. These adults showed substantial improvements over the training period in game performance. MRI scans obtained prior to training revealed that the volume of a number of brain regions, which have been previously associated with subsets of the trained skills, predicted a substantial amount of variance in learning on the complex game. Thus, regional differences in brain volume can predict learning in complex tasks that entail the use of a variety of perceptual, cognitive and motor processes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Netherlands 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
Australia 3 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 203 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 18%
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Researcher 28 13%
Professor 12 5%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 34 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 97 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 38 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,456,791
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Brain & Cognition
#298
of 1,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,094
of 162,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain & Cognition
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.