↓ Skip to main content

Twelve tips for conducting collaborative research in medical education

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Teacher, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Twelve tips for conducting collaborative research in medical education
Published in
Medical Teacher, August 2011
DOI 10.3109/0142159x.2010.547956
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Developing and ensuring successful collaborative research in medical education is no small task, but the rewards to researchers can be great. Collaborative research in medical education offers significant opportunities for investigators who wish to pool limited resources and expand professional networks. Despite this, collaboration often occurs without advance planning for the logistical aspects of collaborative work.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Sierra Leone 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Professor 11 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 23 29%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 56%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Psychology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,549,753
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Medical Teacher
#1,863
of 2,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,249
of 128,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Teacher
#23
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.