The lethal consequences of prostate cancer are related to its metastasis to other organ sites. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has received considerable attention as a conceptual paradigm to explain invasive and metastatic behavior during cancer progression. EMT is a normal physiologic process by which cells of epithelial origin convert into cells bearing mesenchymal characteristics. It has been proposed that EMT is co-opted by cancer cells during their metastatic dissemination from a primary organ to secondary sites, but the extent to which this recapitulates physiologic EMT remains uncertain. However, there is ample evidence that EMT-like states occur in, and may contribute to, prostate cancer progression and metastasis, and so has become a very active area of research. Here we review this evidence and explore recent studies that have aimed to better define the role and mechanisms of EMT in prostate cancer. While definitive evidence of something akin to physiologic EMT is still lacking in human prostate cancer, this area of research has nonetheless provided new avenues of investigation into the longstanding puzzles of metastasis, therapeutic resistance, and prognostic biomarkers.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
2
2%
Immunology and Microbiology
2
2%
Other
4
3%
Unknown
26
21%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,302,478
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Urology
#1,487
of 1,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,750
of 115,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Urology
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
