↓ Skip to main content

Types and Nature of Parental Support for Overweight Students to Cope With Weight‐Related Teasing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of School Health, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Types and Nature of Parental Support for Overweight Students to Cope With Weight‐Related Teasing
Published in
Journal of School Health, September 2017
DOI 10.1111/josh.12551
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Parental support can protect adolescents from various forms of bullying. There is a lack of in-depth information about what social support parents provide to overweight adolescents when they are teased at school. In this study, we took an initial step to address this gap in the literature by describing the types and nature of support that parents provided to their overweight child when they were teased. A conversational style semistructured interview/prompts and probes were conducted with 28 volunteering parents. Inductive content analysis was used to analyze the data. Data trustworthiness was established through a variety of strategies. Six themes emerged from the data: (1) having conversations, being encouraging, and "being supportive"; (2) using religion to teach self-acceptance and comfort their child; (3) offering advice on how to cope with the teasing; (4) fostering their child's self-esteem; (5) teaching reality and acceptance of criticism in early life; and (6) seeking support from other parents or professionals. Parents offered multiple supports for their child when they were teased. This information can facilitate the development of effective family-based interventions on coping with teasing among overweight students. Future research is also needed to examine the effectiveness of the recommended interventions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Researcher 5 4%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 52 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 56 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#16,865,891
of 24,796,946 outputs
Outputs from Journal of School Health
#1,350
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,320
of 320,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of School Health
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,796,946 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.