You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prediction of Forest Canopy and Surface Fuels from Lidar and Satellite Time Series Data in a Bark Beetle-Affected Forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forests, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3390/f8090322 |
| Authors |
Benjamin Bright, Andrew Hudak, Arjan Meddens, Todd Hawbaker, Jennifer Briggs, Robert Kennedy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 19% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 32 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 12% |
| Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,762,416
of 25,088,711 outputs
Outputs from Forests
#742
of 4,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,784
of 321,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forests
#18
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,088,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,427 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.