↓ Skip to main content

Dry-land Bilateral Hand-force Production and Swimming Performance in Paralympic Swimmers

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dry-land Bilateral Hand-force Production and Swimming Performance in Paralympic Swimmers
Published in
International Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2014
DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1364023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

By the nature of their physical impairment Paralympic swimmers generally exhibit an asymmetrical anthropometric profile. The likely causes of asymmetry include bilateral differences in musculoskeletal profile, limitations in flexibility, and muscular imbalances 15. This scenario can lead to impaired balance or propulsion 10 and subsequently impaired swimming performance 3 23. Asymmetry may compromise a swimmer's technique, and compensatory action could lead to further muscle imbalances and potential injury 15. Highlighting the need to investigate the relationships between asymmetry and swim force production. Increases in propulsive force generation are generally associated with improvements in swimming performance 17. Swimming velocity is strongly related to the net forces produced at the hand 11, upper arm 8 and the muscle mass of the arm 4. A close relationship is evident between net force, arm co-ordination, and technical proficiency 2. A swim-bench ergometer targets swimming-specific muscle groups and enables direct bilateral measurement of hand force generation without the confounding drag forces associated with in-water swimming 17 18. This data quantifies left and right side muscle strength asymmetry and the dynamical asymmetry produced during propulsion 7. Assessment of a swimmer's force profile 18 and his or her ability to generate symmetrical muscular power 14 is fundamental for swimming performance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 31 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 26 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 32 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,374,472
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Sports Medicine
#1,872
of 2,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,869
of 227,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Sports Medicine
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.