↓ Skip to main content

Feasible Introgression of an Anti-pathogen Transgene into an Urban Mosquito Population without Using Gene-Drive

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Feasible Introgression of an Anti-pathogen Transgene into an Urban Mosquito Population without Using Gene-Drive
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, July 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002827
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Introgressing anti-pathogen constructs into wild vector populations could reduce disease transmission. It is generally assumed that such introgression would require linking an anti-pathogen gene with a selfish genetic element or similar technologies. Yet none of the proposed transgenic anti-pathogen gene-drive mechanisms are likely to be implemented as public health measures in the near future. Thus, much attention now focuses instead on transgenic strategies aimed at mosquito population suppression, an approach generally perceived to be practical. By contrast, aiming to replace vector competent mosquito populations with vector incompetent populations by releasing mosquitoes carrying a single anti-pathogen gene without a gene-drive mechanism is widely considered impractical.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Peru 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2014.
All research outputs
#17,847,720
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#6,933
of 10,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,971
of 245,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#122
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.