| Title |
Influenza epidemiology and immunization during pregnancy: Final report of a World Health Organization working group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vaccine, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deshayne B. Fell, Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, Michael G. Baker, Maneesh Batra, Julien Beauté, Philippe Beutels, Niranjan Bhat, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, Cheryl Cohen, Bremen De Mucio, Bradford D. Gessner, Michael G. Gravett, Mark A. Katz, Marian Knight, Vernon J. Lee, Mark Loeb, Johannes M. Luteijn, Helen Marshall, Harish Nair, Kevin Pottie, Rehana A. Salam, David A. Savitz, Suzanne J. Serruya, Becky Skidmore, Justin R. Ortiz, on behalf of the WHO taskforce to evaluate influenza data to inform vaccine impact and economic modelling |
| Abstract |
From 2014 to 2017, the World Health Organization convened a working group to evaluate influenza disease burden and vaccine efficacy to inform estimates of maternal influenza immunization program impact. The group evaluated existing systematic reviews and relevant primary studies, and conducted four new systematic reviews. There was strong evidence that maternal influenza immunization prevented influenza illness in pregnant women and their infants, although data on severe illness prevention were lacking. The limited number of studies reporting influenza incidence in pregnant women and infants under six months had highly variable estimates and underrepresented low- and middle-income countries. The evidence that maternal influenza immunization reduces the risk of adverse birth outcomes was conflicting, and many observational studies were subject to substantial bias. The lack of scientific clarity regarding disease burden or magnitude of vaccine efficacy against severe illness poses challenges for robust estimation of the potential impact of maternal influenza immunization programs. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 66 | 35% |