↓ Skip to main content

SPECIAL ISSUE “Beautiful Urban Areas Creation Needs the Development of Bases for Roadside Treesrdquo;

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 125)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SPECIAL ISSUE “Beautiful Urban Areas Creation Needs the Development of Bases for Roadside Treesrdquo;
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, January 2009
DOI 10.7211/jjsrt.35.267
Authors

SUGA Takako

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,301,033
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#12
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,180
of 183,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them