↓ Skip to main content

Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Obstetrics & Gynecology, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
64 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
61 Redditors
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Racial Differences in Pelvic Anatomy by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published in
Obstetrics & Gynecology, April 2008
DOI 10.1097/aog.0b013e318169ce03
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To use static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare dimensions of the bony pelvis and soft tissue structures in a sample of African-American and white women.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 44 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 34%
Engineering 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 48 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2026.
All research outputs
#665,315
of 34,336,386 outputs
Outputs from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#480
of 12,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,225
of 137,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obstetrics & Gynecology
#3
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,336,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.