Lentiviral vectors pseudotyped with the baculovirus envelope protein GP64 transduce primary cultures of human airway epithelia (HAE) at their apical surface. Our goal in this study was to harness a directed evolution approach to develop a novel envelope glycoprotein with increased transduction properties for HAE. Using error-prone PCR, a library of GP64 mutants was generated and used to prepare a diverse pool of lentiviral virions pseudotyped with GP64 variants. The library was serially passaged on HAE and three GP64 mutations were recovered. Single-, double- and the triple-combination mutant envelope glycoproteins were compared with wild-type GP64 for their ability to transduce HAE. Our results suggest that lentiviral vectors pseudotyped with evolved GP64 transduced HAE with greater efficiency than wild-type GP64. This effect was not observed in primary cultures of porcine airway epithelial cells, suggesting that the directed evolution protocol was species specific. In summary, our studies indicate that serial passage of a GP64 mutant library yielded specific variants with improved HAE cell tropism, yielding tools with the potential to improve the success of gene therapy for airway diseases.Gene Therapy advance online publication, 7 September 2017; doi:10.1038/gt.2017.78.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,023,255
of 32,502,987 outputs
Outputs from Gene Therapy
#3,273
of 3,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,251
of 343,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene Therapy
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,502,987 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
