↓ Skip to main content

Autosomal dominant calpainopathy due to heterozygous CAPN3 C.643_663del21

Overview of attention for article published in Muscle & Nerve, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Autosomal dominant calpainopathy due to heterozygous CAPN3 C.643_663del21
Published in
Muscle & Nerve, September 2017
DOI 10.1002/mus.25970
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A calpain-3 (CAPN3) gene heterozygous deletion (c.643_663del21) was recently linked to autosomal dominant (AD) limb girdle muscular dystrophy. However, the possibility of digenic disease was raised. We describe three families with AD calpainopathy carrying this isolated mutation. Probands heterozygous for CAPN3 c.643_663del21 were identified by targeted next generation or whole exome sequencing. Clinical findings were collected for probands and families. Calpain-3 muscle western blots were performed in three unrelated individuals. Probands reported variable weakness in their 40s-50s with myalgia, back pain or hyperlordosis. Pelvic girdle muscles were affected with adductor and hamstring sparing. CK was normal-1,800 U/L independent of weakness severity. Imaging demonstrated lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy. EMG and muscle biopsies were normal to mildly myopathic. Muscle calpain-3 expression was reduced. This study provides further evidence for AD calpainopathy associated with CAPN3 c.643_663del21. No pathogenic variants in other genes known to cause myopathy were detected. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 20 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,446,373
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Muscle & Nerve
#2,533
of 2,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,691
of 321,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Muscle & Nerve
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.