↓ Skip to main content

Pressure injuries in people with darker skin tones: A literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
47 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pressure injuries in people with darker skin tones: A literature review
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, October 2017
DOI 10.1111/jocn.14062
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In this paper we aimed to explore the literature to ascertain what research evidence exists in relation to the identification of pressure injuries (PIs) in people with dark skin tones (DSTs). PI development has been widely researched and documented; however, much of this work does not address ethnicity or race, and assumes Caucasian-ness. Thus, the perceptions of people with DSTs and the influence of skin pigmentation on identification and management of PIs is under examined. Literature review. A comprehensive electronic database search was undertaken of PubMed, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane and British Nursing Index between 1990 - July 2016. Alongside the electronic data, journals, books, papers from conferences, relevant national and international organisations and reference lists were also used to help source key studies. A search of the literature revealed 11 relevant articles. The foci of studies included: risk of sustaining a PI based on skin tones; identification of PIs amongst people with DSTs; PI and place of care; and socio-economic impact on PI development. Overall, findings indicate that people with darker skin tones are more likely to develop higher stage pressure injuries. Reasons for this are not fully elucidated; however, it may be associated with current skin assessment protocols being less effective for people who have darker skin tones resulting in early damage arising from pressure not being recognised. From the literature reviewed it can be seen that there is a lack of guidance and evidence, people with darker skin tones are more likely in comparison to people presenting as Caucasian to develop higher stage pressure injuries. The current literature suggests a need for researchers and clinicians to consider skin tone variances rather than ethnicity when exploring comprehensive skin assessment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 37 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 39 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,233,316
of 33,241,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#167
of 6,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,133
of 352,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#10
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,241,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.