↓ Skip to main content

Efficient gene delivery into cell lines and stem cells using baculovirus

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Protocols, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Efficient gene delivery into cell lines and stem cells using baculovirus
Published in
Nature Protocols, July 2014
DOI 10.1038/nprot.2014.130
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Baculovirus is a promising vector for transducing numerous types of mammalian cells. We have developed hybrid baculovirus vectors and protocols for the efficient transduction of a variety of cell lines, primary cells and stem cells, including bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). The hybrid vector enables intracellular minicircle formation and prolongs transgene expression. The advantages of this transduction protocol are that baculovirus supernatant alone needs to be added to cells growing in medium, and transduction occurs after only 4-6 h of incubation at room temperature (25 °C) with gentle shaking. The entire procedure, from virus generation to transduction, can be completed within 4 weeks. Compared with other transduction procedures, this protocol is simple and can confer efficiencies >95% for many cell types. This protocol has potential applications in tissue regeneration, as transduced cells continue to express transgenes after implantation. For example, transduction of rabbit ASCs (rASCs) with growth factor-encoding hybrid baculovirus vectors, as described as an example application in this protocol, enables robust and sustained growth factor expression, stimulates stem cell differentiation and augments tissue regeneration after implantation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 25%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 29%
Chemistry 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#9,627,981
of 29,698,267 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#2,329
of 3,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,117
of 247,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#35
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,698,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.