Standardization of radiation therapy dose for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer through changes to a lung cancer clinical pathway in a large, integrated comprehensive cancer center network
The results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617, which randomized patients with stages IIIA/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to definitive chemoradiation therapy to 60 Gy versus 74 Gy, demonstrated a detrimental survival impact with high-dose radiation therapy. We evaluated the impact of changes to a provider-driven clinical pathway (CP) guiding management of NSCLC on practice throughout our cancer center network.
In 2001, we implemented a CP for management of stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC with definitive chemoradiation therapy. In 2013, the CP for NSCLC was amended (amendment 1) to allow a dose range of 60 to 74 Gy. The CP was amended (amendment 2) in January 2016 to specify a dose range of 60 to 70 Gy. Higher doses were considered off-pathway and subject to peer review. Data from decisions entered from 2012 to 2016 were obtained.
From 2012 until publication of RTOG 0617 in February 2015, the median prescription dose was 66 Gy delivered in 1.8 to 2.1 Gy fractions. Doses ≤66 Gy were prescribed for 52% of patients. From February 2015 to September 2016, the median prescription dose was 60 Gy, and 91% of prescription doses were ≤66 Gy. After amendment 2, 99% of decisions were ≤66 Gy. Dose ≤66 Gy was associated with treatment following publication of 0617 (P < .001) and treatment after amendment 2 (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, treatment after amendment 2 was associated with dose ≤66 Gy (odds ratio, 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 5.2-19.0; P < .001). The percentage of lung receiving 20 Gy was lower following publication of 0617 (P < .001). There was no difference in the percentage of heart receiving 40 Gy.
CPs eliminate variations in practice that lead to inferior outcomes. Recognizing that our CP for definitive treatment of patients with locally advanced NSCLC allowed heterogeneous dose prescriptions, we modified the CP based on the publication of RTOG 0617. We found that the CP was a tool to ensure patients receive evidence-based care across a large cancer center network.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
2
7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
1
3%
Immunology and Microbiology
1
3%
Other
2
7%
Unknown
9
31%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,505,694
of 29,467,797 outputs
Outputs from Practical Radiation Oncology
#874
of 1,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,060
of 335,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Practical Radiation Oncology
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,467,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
