↓ Skip to main content

Are African American Patients More Likely to Receive a Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Low‐quality Hospital?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Are African American Patients More Likely to Receive a Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Low‐quality Hospital?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11999-011-2032-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Total joint arthroplasty is widely performed in patients of all races with severe osteoarthritis. Prior studies have reported that African American patients tend to receive total joint arthroplasties in low-volume hospitals compared with Caucasian patients, suggesting potential racial disparity in the quality of arthroplasty care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 10 16%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 51%
Psychology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,604,339
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#848
of 9,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,989
of 174,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#10
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.