Abstract Background: Hospice and palliative care are underutilized among patients at the end of their lives despite evidence that they improve patient satisfaction and reduce costs. Objective: To synthesize evidence regarding interventions to increase hospice referral/enrollment. Design and Measurements: We conducted a systematic review of the literature and selected studies that evaluated interventions aimed at increasing hospice use. We performed a MEDLINE search (1979 to April 2013) supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies of key articles. Study design, quality criteria, population, interventions, and outcomes for each study were extracted. The main outcome evaluated was hospice referral/enrollment. Results: Our search strategy yielded 419 studies, of which only 6 met our eligibility criteria. Three studies included nursing home populations; 1 included home care patients, 1 targeted care managers, and 1 reported on heart failure patients. Three studies had a cohort design, 2 were pre-post, and only 1 was randomized. Two studies evaluated a process to identify eligible subjects. Two evaluated the impact of advance care planning programs and 2 only provided education. Interventions that only provided education showed a median increase in referral of 5% (2.8%-17%) while interventions that identified hospice candidates showed a median increase in hospice referral of 19.5 % (19%-20%). Conclusions: Interventions of different levels of complexity can improve the use of hospice services among subjects with high mortality risk. An approach that allows the medical team to assess patients' treatment goals and that engages the treating physician seems to be the most successful one.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#19,250,998
of 30,038,132 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Palliative Medicine
#2,523
of 3,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,691
of 246,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Palliative Medicine
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,038,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
